<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coming Soon: Review of Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sublime-light.com/index.php/2009/06/02/coming-soon-review-of-canon-70-200-f28l-is/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sublime-light.com/index.php/2009/06/02/coming-soon-review-of-canon-70-200-f28l-is/</link>
	<description>Learn to Shoot Like a Pro!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 02:12:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim Solley</title>
		<link>http://www.sublime-light.com/index.php/2009/06/02/coming-soon-review-of-canon-70-200-f28l-is/comment-page-1/#comment-24657</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Solley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sublime-light.com/index.php/2009/06/02/coming-soon-review-of-canon-70-200-f28l-is/#comment-24657</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment Keith.

While I don&#039;t have access to a f/4 IS, I have a friend who does have the f/4 non IS version.  I&#039;ll probably see if I can do some comparison there.  Since with my IS version I can turn it off, I can do some IS vs. non IS comparison.

So I can at least compare optics between the f/4 and f/2.8.  Stay tuned!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Keith.</p>
<p>While I don&#8217;t have access to a f/4 IS, I have a friend who does have the f/4 non IS version.  I&#8217;ll probably see if I can do some comparison there.  Since with my IS version I can turn it off, I can do some IS vs. non IS comparison.</p>
<p>So I can at least compare optics between the f/4 and f/2.8.  Stay tuned!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.sublime-light.com/index.php/2009/06/02/coming-soon-review-of-canon-70-200-f28l-is/comment-page-1/#comment-24656</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sublime-light.com/index.php/2009/06/02/coming-soon-review-of-canon-70-200-f28l-is/#comment-24656</guid>
		<description>Any chance that you&#039;ll be performing any level of comparison between this lens and the f4 IS?  I&#039;m continually tossed up between the two.  f2.8 is a big draw, but the f4 has weight on its side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any chance that you&#8217;ll be performing any level of comparison between this lens and the f4 IS?  I&#8217;m continually tossed up between the two.  f2.8 is a big draw, but the f4 has weight on its side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

